Christianity. What Went Wrong Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Christianity. What Went Wrong - search Paper ExampleThe conflict between Christianity and modern thought has been one of the intriguing parts that happened in those times. hatful know that modern thought is non really welcome in terms of Christian practices. Christianity has always been traditional and known to remain like that for years. Modernity, on the other hand, affects Christianity in a good sense that it gives new ideas and raises questions that can influence the dignity of Christianity. There ar studies which intentionally provide other meanings and interpretations of the Christian faith. In connection, these studies provide confusions to some Christian believers. Modern thought causes other people to have a different understanding of the Christian teachings. Modernity, in parity, had taken over the minds of the people in the nineteenth ampere-second. People bring forthed to transition themselves to a modernized world. Thus, giving them the new perspective that they have the freedom to redesign themselves and non just to stay in what seems to be the traditional way. There are many scholars who study the mystery story behind Christianity. However, despite their efforts in making Christianity stand firm, these studies even led to rising of conflicts in Christian world. With all the modernity during the nineteenth century plus their studies regarding Christianity, everything went puzzled and confused causing people to start criticizing and questioning. In relation, one of the scholars who made a name in terms of theology during the nineteenth century is Friedrich Schleiermacher. He is said to be very influential during the nineteenth century. His influence has marked the history of theology. ... Hence, Schleiermacher has been named as the father of liberal theology. His study created many conflicts with regard to Christianity since he has a different view for religion. Roger Olson substantiate that, for Schleiermacher, Christianity and religion are all about deep and inner awareness (1999, 544). All religions, specifically Christianity, are based chiefly in the experience of every human being. Roger Olson states that, for Schleiermacher, it is distinctly human awareness of something absolute beyond the self on which the self is dependent for everything (1999, 544). Schleiermacher cleared that in terms of principles, the two should not be in questioned Christianity and science. In addition, Roger Olson notes that to Schleiermacher, any mystical divine interventions were not square(a). In his own viewpoint, these things do not exist at all (1994, 544). He even changed the traditional belief on the article of faith about the two natures of Jesus Christ. For him, instead of having this belief, it should merely focus on the experience of Jesus with the God-consciousness. The somebody who is known as the father of modern liberal theology proposed that spiritual feeling results to a true religion. Schleiermacher convinced pe ople that to obtain true religion, one should submit a relationship to the source of lifetime as stated by Gary Dorrien (1997, 12). In addition, Schleiermacher affirmed that one cannot have true religion if it is mainly based in morality, as well as doctrines. Gary Dorrien stated that knowledge, in terms of morality and science, should be taken away so that one can experience true religion and creates a relation with the source of life (1997, 13). Schleiermacher firmly believes that a persons feeling plays a